Disclaimer: I won’t be using the first website because
it always generated the same thing with the same information, it just changed
the names in put into the generator.
The task at hand is to go
online see a couple of websites, see conventions within different genres, and then
to explain how such websites can give people a better understanding of what exactly
a “genre” is.
Pandyland is comic strip
website; the creator of makes a comic out of three boxes and then uploads them
to this website; this website then randomly selects three of the many boxes and
makes a single comic strip out of them. The best part about this website is
that most of the time the strip that is generated makes no sense, but even
though they make no sense I still find them funny. Most of these generated
strips tend to have at least one box that contains a violent action, either the
characters assaulting each other, or of them doing self-inflicted damage. Another
convention in these strips would definitely have to be the vulgar language; the
two characters consistently curse at each other and sometimes reference their
genitals. I’m not too certain about this being a convention, but I noticed that
in some of the strips, the comic starts off with what people would call a
conversation starting, and by the end, most of the time, the comic has nothing
to do with what was presented at the beginning. The final convention I could
find is that you could make a comedic strip by only using two of the chosen
boxes and completely ignoring the other one that could possibly be making the
strip incoherent.
Prior to this assignment,
I had never really looked at memes. I now know that certain memes contain text
that go with them; it could be said that meme has their own conventions. A
really popular meme is the one with the dinosaur; his memes are always
captioned with, what I think are meant to be, thought provoking questions. Why
this is so, is unclear to me. The memes containing “the most interesting man in
the world,” mostly have to do with how the man does things; they all start with
the, “I don’t always…” phrase. Something all the memes have in common are their
witty captioning; they are all meant to be funny and easy to understand. This
captioning is also always in big white bold letters so that they capture the
attention of the reader. Obviously since they are memes, they must include a picture
or drawing of some sort. These pictures are usually something that went viral
on the internet and stood out enough to able to be associated with something
that somebody thought others would find funny.
While searching online
for some genre generator, I thought about book titles and found a decent
website, Fantasy Name Generators, whose purpose is to create titles for
different genres ranging from sci-fi, children, humor, horror, and many more.
I’ll only be considering the conventions for the aforementioned genres. From
what I gather, sci-fi genre titles, according to this website, tend to have
words in the title that deal with robot/androids and of course outer space, encompasses
aliens. The children genre was dominated by titles that included names of
animals or other simple nouns, such as flowers, buildings, or imaginary things.
This website has a weird humor generator because the tiles it was suggesting
were all terrible. These titles consisted mainly of two completely unrelated
words being connected by conjunction.
There are a wide variety
of different genres so understating genre can be difficult, but by using
websites, such as these that create random genres, one can learn to identify
what makes up a genre, its conventions. All of these websites had obvious repeating
patterns when they each gave out their random genre. For example, as stated
earlier, the comic website usually had violence and profanity, the memes
website had those bold words and iconic viral pictures, the title generator had
couple of patterns for each genre they had. The point is that genre is just a
big broad picture of everything because within the subject of genre there are many
sub-genres, that can have even more sub-genres. A Genre is like a group that
consist of many pieces of writing or any medium that incorporate certain conventions,
but even these conventions can have conventions, thus making those conventions
possible genres, very specific genres.
Hector,
ReplyDeleteI’m surprised that you chose a Charles Dickens novel for your PB1A. If you genuinely like it, that’s totally cool, but I want you to really focus in on material that you (actually) find interesting for our course. If you pick topics that you “think the teacher wants you to pick” (ie, me) I think you won’t get as much out of the course. So in the future, I want to highly encourage you to work from your existing interests.
OK, all that said, Great Expectations isn’t really a genre, although it can be an example OF a genre such as a novel or an 18th century (or whatever it is) novel. Genres are similar textual forms (of writing) that share similarities and social purposes and conventions, and so Great Expectations can’t really share anything with anything because it’s 1 isolated book. You mentioned that the story is a mystery, and that’s great—that’s the kind of stylistic/plot-based elements that help bind other similar mystery novels/stories together. So, that said: what are some common textual conventions/ingredients/patterns of mystery-based pieces of writing? What in the writing is observable?
When you analyze genres, I want you to get more concrete. Get specific. Make claims about the (textual) language being used. Providing direct textual evidence (i.e., quoting) can help you do that (and in order to do that, you need to reference specific examples—this could have added a stronger layer to your analysis).
On to PB1B, I think you did a more effective job of pinpointing specific conventions to back up your claims. I especially like how you addressed the organizational/structural considerations of the comic and how/why that is impacted when a context-less generator spews out ~nonsense. To me, this is evidence that gets at the importance of writers/designers creating something that logically flows/builds in a meaningful way.
I think your next major step is to back up your claims by helping me to SEE what you want me to see. The best way to do that is to call my (and other readers’) attention to actual slices of language that you think represent something important.
In Writing 2, we’re trying to train you to become super-observant so that you can get down to the nittiest of details and adhere (if that’s what you want to do) to the audience’s expectations. You’re well on our way. By gaining a deeper and more critical reading awareness, you’ll be able to adopt/adapt writer’s choices (their writing) into your own writing—we’re not quite there yet (that’s WP2!), but we’ve got a good start.
One last thought: feel free to toss in some images if you think that’ll enhance your readers’ experience.
Z